Analysis of gender relations in modern social and human sciences

Authors

  • Kagazbekova S. Nur-Mubarak University of islamic culture
  • Rakhipova S. Zhetysu State University named after I. Zhansugurova
  • Zatov K. Nur-Mubarak University of islamic culture
  • Adilbayeva Sh. Nur-Mubarak University of islamic culture

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26577/jpcp.2020.v73.i3.10
        47 55

Abstract

Modern Kazakhstan is a multi-confessional state that provides absolutely equal rights to its citizens.
The gender approach presupposes not only an innovative rethinking of the position of women,
but also the search for practical ways to free her from outdated ideas about herself and her role in the
modern world. The article describes the processes of the development of gender relations in the social
and humanitarian sciences, and also gives their new models adopted in Kazakhstan, in particular in
the field of political science, law, economics and religious studies. Based on the results of the ranking
on gender equality, developed by the international community, the results of political, economic, religious
and legal research in Kazakhstan are analyzed. Kazakhstani society is characterized by its own
consistent development of modern gender relations in these areas.
It should be noted that gender studies broadens the scope of innovation and research in sociology,
including religion. First of all, this is due to the processes of secularization, modernization and emancipation.
The question of the role and importance of gender studies and feminism in the field of religion
arises in connection with the increase in the level of religiosity among women, which researchers
interpret in different ways, but most of these approaches are based on theoretical principles of gender.
Key words: gender, politics, gender economy, religion.

Downloads

Published

2020-09-29

How to Cite

S., K., S., R., K., Z., & Sh., A. (2020). Analysis of gender relations in modern social and human sciences. Journal of Philosophy, Culture and Political Science, 73(3), 88–95. https://doi.org/10.26577/jpcp.2020.v73.i3.10