A critical review of conceptual approaches to indigenisation

Abstract

Indigenization has become an imperative on the global social science and social work agenda following several decades of active discourse. At the same time, there are important aspects of this process that require critical reflection. The aim of this study was to conduct a critical review of conceptual approaches to indigenization in international practice. Based on systematic search and selection of articles, 25 articles were identified that make a significant contribution to the conceptualization of indigenization. A critical analysis revealed that indigenization comprises two interrelated processes: the adaptation of imported knowledge and the identification of authentic roots within the local system. Essential to both processes is the use of indigenous knowledge - which originates from, is reflected in, interpreted by, and is relevant to a specific culture as well as a questioning of the universality of imported knowledge. Indigenization carries risks relating to essentialism, ethnocentrism and ethical principles. One way to mitigate these risks is through a discipline-oriented approach to indigenization, where the focus shifts towards the practical application of indigenous knowledge. At the same time, the implementation of indigenization varies across different countries, depending on historical experience and the political context. Based on a critical review, a conceptual model for analyzing indigenization has been developed, synthesizing ideas from various schools, including contradictory ones. It has made it possible to identify the components, conditions, risks and opportunities associated with indigenization. The resulting model for analyzing indigenization is useful for further research and practical application in Kazakhstan and other Central Asian countries.
Keywords: indigenization, authentization, professional imperialism, cultural diversity, social science, social work.