Aesthetic dimensions of contemporaneity: social body and perspectives of its representation

  • А. Г. Карабаева
  • Н. А. Антонова

Abstract

The article considers situations of contemporary social context construction:roles and mechanisms of social body representations, cases ofrepresentative practices in context of social relations, as well as temporaland spatial continuums of social body are reviewed. Social body involvedin process of social imaginary formation turns out to be an occurrence ofperception, comprehension, interpretation and transformation of common,individual consciousness and being. Identifying the cohesion of singularand collective body experience through notions of image and medium, weexplicate aesthetic as an inevitable part of social body.

References

1 МакКормак Э. Когнитивная теория метафоры: пер. с анг., фр., нем., исп., польск. яз.; вступ. ст. и сост. Н. Д. Арутюновой;
под. общ. ред. Н.Д. Арутюновой и М.А. Журинской. // Теория метафоры: сборник. – М.: Прогресс, 1990. – 512 с.
2 Касториадис К. Воображаемое установление общества: пер с фр.; пер Г. Волковой, С. Офертаса. – М.: Издательство
«Гнозис», Издательство «Логос», 2003. – 480 с.
3 Taylor C. What is a «Social imaginary»? // Modern social imaginaries. – Duke University Press, 2004. – Pp. 23-30.
4 Belting H. Image, Medium, Body: A New Approach to Iconology // Critical Inquiry. Winter 2005. – №2 (31) . – Pp. 302-319
5 Шкловский В. О теории прозы. – М.: Федерация, 1929. – 265 с.
6 Boehm G. Indeterminacy: On the Logic of the Image // Dynamics and Performativity of Imagination: The Image between
the Visible and the Invisible (edited by Huppauf B. and Wulf C.). Taylor & Francis, 2009. – Pp. 219-229.
7 Wulf C. Images of Social Life // Dynamics and Performativity of Imagination: The Image between the Visible and the Invisible
(edited by Huppauf B. and Wulf C.). Taylor & Francis, 2009. – Pp. 166-177.
8 Адорно Т. В., Эстетическая теория. – М.: Республика, 2001. – 527 с.
9 Гадамер Г.-Г. Актуальность прекрасного. – М.: Искусство, 1991. – 367 с.
10 Панкина Н. Качественные характеристики временного континуума современности: опыт до-модерного воображаемого
// Materials of the XI International Scientific and Practical Conference, «Areas of Scientific Thought», - 2014/2015. Volume
9. Philosophy. Political science. Sheffield. Science and Education LTD. – Pp. 29-32.
11 Cohn J. S. Anarchism and the Crisis of Representation: Hermeneutics, Aesthetics, Politics. – Selinsgrove: Susquehanna
University Press, 2006. – 311 p.
12 Фуко М. Интеллектуалы и власть: Избранные политические статьи, выступления и интервью / пер. с франц. С.Ч.
Офертаса; под общ. ред. В.П. Визгина и Б.М. Скуратова. – М.: Праксис, 2002. – 384 с.
13 Lefebvre H. The Production of Space. Translated by Donald Nicholson-Smith. – Blackwell Publishing, 2007. – 434 p.
Published
2015-04-01
How to Cite
КАРАБАЕВА, А. Г.; АНТОНОВА, Н. А.. Aesthetic dimensions of contemporaneity: social body and perspectives of its representation. Journal of Philosophy, Culture and Political Science, [S.l.], v. 51, n. 2, apr. 2015. ISSN 2617-5843. Available at: <http://bulletin-philospolit.kaznu.kz/index.php/1-pol/article/view/64>. Date accessed: 19 apr. 2019.

Keywords

social body, practices of representation, social imaginary, aesthetic.